Monday, December 31, 2012

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Ratings: 7.7/10
Film Class: A
Genre: Fantasy Adventure

Bilbo Baggins, a Hobbit (aka Halfling), goes on an unexpected journey with a group of 13 Dwarves to the Lonely Mountain, the mountain which the Dwarves once called home but was taken over by the dragon, Smaug. 

If you've watched The Lord of The Rings trilogy, the characters (actually to be specific, the races of Middle-earth such as the Elves, Dwarves, Hobbits, Wizards, Orcs, Troys etc.), the fantasy world and the story would strike a familiar ring... even if you haven't, the narrative-style story plots/development was clear and introductory even to laymen. 

Since The Hobbit was written and published before The Lord of The Rings as a children's fantasy novel, you can expect the movie to be pretty kiddish at times. The trailer pre-emped me for cheesy light-hearted humor. I cannot help but compare this with The Lord of The Rings, and my expectations of it didn't fail me. 

All in all, I didn't quite like The Hobbit. It was a notch down and the action scenes weren't too pow-wow-ry. Which of course would be unfair of me to fault it because of the genre of it, but all in all, it's achieves what it was intended to, to entertain and to bring the audience into a world new fantasy world, not exactly that new for most. The CG this time round wasn't that awesomely realistic... which also made a fair bit of contribution to its inferiority.

*spoilers ahead* There's more screen time for Gandalf, the Wizard, and I didn't like how everytime the group of Dwarves got into trouble, Gandalf would always come to save the day. It made the Dwarves look pretty weak, unlike the group who went to Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring to rule them all. And while the battle-of-the-wits scene of Smeagol (the cunning schizo Gollum) and Bilbo Baggings was refreshing, it turned out draggy after a while. *major spoilers ahead* The ending scene with the griffins rescuing the group made me wonder why didn't they just bring the entire group to Lonely Mountain? Apart from the fact that it would cut the story short from a trilogy to a monology? 

However, since Bilbo Baggins is the uncle of Frodo Baggins, the protagonist from The Lord of The Rings, there was a cameo of, of course his adopted son Frodo! There were also Galadriel (Cate Blanchett), Saruman (Christopher Lee, not Singapore's Christopher Lee), Smeagol (The Gollum) and Elrond (Hugo Weaving, villain from the Matrix Trilogy and protagonist of V for Vendetta). All of which I believe will be featured again the next 2 sequels to come. 

Don't bother sitting till the end of the credits because there isn't any after credits scenes, the last scene, is of the gold basking Smaug, period. 

So did it have a cliff hanger ending just like most trilogies would? I wouldn't say so, for it ended quite well actually... even though it was pretty anti-climaxal. The nemesis of the supposed Dwarves King, Thorin accompanying the group was the Orc Captain Boldog, who slayed Thorin's father, the previous King. There was a confrontation between Thorin and Boldog at the end, but the action was short-lived, hence, the disappointing anti-climaxal ending. 

Thorin had the charisma of Aragorn (the human "King" from Lord of The Rings), a character worth cheering for, but despite the disappointment, I'm putting my chips on an epic duel of him with Boldog in the upcoming sequels. 

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Life of Pi

Ratings: 8.4/10
Film Class: B+ 
Genre: "Fantasy" Drama

I was holding back my 3 earlier posts because I didn't have the drive to blog them especially during this hectic period of mine. However, after watching Life of Pi today, I thought I certainly had to post a review of it. 

I held back on watching it, cos' frankly, I don't really like how "fake" the visuals seem during the trailer. They were too fantasy-like for me. And to watch a movie about a boy and his friendship with a tiger? I expected it to be preeety booring... 

I did slap myself (not literally) after that, not to keep myself awake, but for thinking this movie was going to be just another kiddy-fantasy lack of dialogue film. Even though he did direct a few good movies, I'm not a fan of Ang Lee, so I wasn't tempted by the mention of his name in the trailer. And the fact that the book was once a best seller, also wasn't that strong a motivation for me. 

I... caught it anyway (had 2 free tickets), and thank God I did. Just like how this film would have explained it, I believe there's a reason for everything that happens. 

Be prepared for a rather lengthy review, any less of it would be to do it injustice. I've heard a couple of my friends saying how they didn't like the movie because it was a very "alone"/solo kinda film. Well, you either like it, or you don't. A boy being stranded out at sea with having only the company of a tiger. Was this like Cast Away? And as some of the reviews claim, "The Next Avatar"? Er... yup, it's stating the obvious, but Life of Pi is in a class of its own. To sum it up early, it's like a hybrid of Cast Away, Avatar, Big Fish, Chronicles of Narnia and Doubt.

*Major major spoilers ahead, with synopsis, sorry for being evil by fusing the 2, just this time I promise. But if you haven't caught the film, I would recommend checking the synopsis out on Imdb first... * 

Cast Away, because he's stranded at sea, and instead of "Wilson", Tom Hanks' rugby ball, there's "Richard Parker", the tiger. But it's not that void of dialogue because Pi, the protagonist's name, would think-talk to himself and the story was narrated by the adult Pi, hence the story of Pi. 

Avatar, cos' of the stunning out-of-the-world visuals of the ocean creatures. While mostly exaggerated at times, it brings out the beauty of the ocean and it's habitants during unwelcoming (for the cast)/ welcoming (for the audience) moments. Notably, the scenes of luminous jelly fishes, flying fishes and the island full of meerkats were all breathtakingly memorable. 

Big Fish, the entire movie was a narrative film, showing a novelist interviewing, or having a chat with a grown up Pi. There were elements of fantasy in his story, but instead of them being viewed as unreal, in Big Fish, Life of Pi is more directed towards the "fantasy" being true. 

Chronicles of Narnia, there were references to religions, and a unique on-screen discussion about religions, specifically Hinduism, Islam and Christianity. While I don't exactly know how the animals and Pi are referenced, I would imagine there's some hint of "Noah's Ark" and the relationship with God between Pi and the tiger. 

Doubt, at the end of film, it doesn't tell you the "truth", but more on what you want to believe. The movie gives you the choice to believe what is, and what is not, though it was skewed towards the "fantasy" being the truth. I thought it was inappropriate to leave out the inverted commas in "fantasy" when I typed it in the genre because just like one's faith and belief in God, while some "facts" cannot be reasoned like the splitting of the Red Sea by Moses etc., that doesn't exactly mean it's not real or that it didn't happen... which is one of the main plots of the movie. 

If after reading you still don't know what this movie is about, it's actually primarily about faith in God (religions). 

The opening scene already got me psyched with what seemed like a short 5-min silent documentary on animals (I love animals!). The scenes behind the origins of the boy and how he got his name were light-hearted and engaging, but things got rather sombre after his shipwreck, leaving him all alone with the tiger. 

If you thought this movie was about a boy and his friendship with the stranded animals, you thought wrong. The only stranded animal was the tiger. The only animal he ever made connection with was the tiger. And if you thought this movie was about a seemingly impossible friendship with a tiger on board a stranded boat, you thought wrong too. Because the connection with the tiger was a realistic one. No hugging, BFFs one-tragedy brought them closer together scenes. What you'll see is the constant fear and constant efforts by Pi to tame the wild tiger. 

Making friends was never on his agenda, surviving was. There was no human pet-talk to the tiger which would somehow make it seem to understand human language, or either of them protecting one another by shielding the other party with their bodies... or what not. The "loose" connection between the both of them, was what I didn't expect, and was glad there wasn't the cliché animal-human connections one would normally see in films. 

There were quite a handful of "morals of the story", one on faith in religions, the other on the strength of the human spirit, also on whether animals actually "feel" and another, about goodbyes. I didn't get the carnivorous island and thought the discovery of a tooth in a wrapped up plant was off, but am sure it meant something.

The ending scene explained blatantly that the tiger did feel for Pi (that Pi did cross his mind before leaving him) and that connections between animals and humans were indeed possible, even with vicious carnivorous wild animals. Just like humans, all animals have souls, and having a soul means more than just being stuck at survivor instincts, but also being able to create invisible connections. 

But the one thing which really struck a chord in my heart was about saying goodbye. And I will leave you with that. 

There was a scene about Pi explaining to the novelist that he felt hurt that the tiger didn't even look back at him before entering the woods and disappearing from his life forever. He also regretted never saying goodbye to his father and to his family who died during the shipwreck. 

The goodbyes that really matter, are never said. Or at least one would never really have the chance to say their final goodbyes. When someone close to you passes away, it will always be too late to say your goodbyes because you wouldn't expect it to happen, resulting in life-time remorse. Cherish your loved ones, and tell them how much they mean to you because you won't have the chance to say goodbye to them when they leave you for good. And even though someone doesn't say goodbye to you or vice versa, it doesn't mean everything that happened before didn't matter, it did, it's just a matter of being able to "hear" the silent goodbyes...

Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted


Ratings: 7.5/10
Film Class: B+
Genre: Animated Comedy, Family

When they announced Madagascar 3 was coming out, I was thinking to myself... not again. The first of its series was good, but I didn't like 2. And now 3? I thought the novelty would have died, just like the Ice Age series, and true enough, it was a little too cliché at the start. 

However, it accomplished what few animations did before (can't think of any at the top my head though, perhaps the first?)... it got better and better as the story progresses. The opening scene was a fast-paced introduction of the "old gang" of animals... the lion, the zebra, the giraffe, the hippo, the lemur and his right hand man, the penguins and the monkeys. 

There's no hidden Master Yoda in an old woman this time round, but there is a superbly nimble and resourceful, animal hunter, Captain Chantel DuBois. She deserves to be mentioned because she's a force to be reckoned with as she's the ultimate animated Homo Sapien villain you'll ever be acquainted with... opps.. perhaps I'm overdoing it a little. 

*spoilers ahead* I love the new animal additions, and when the new characters from the circus were introduced, they added color to the dulling characters. After which, it was a spectacle of eye-feasting visuals when they finally pulled off a successful circus performance. I'm sure the team behind the movie felt the same way as I did, and was glad they finally decided to end off the franchise with this final sequel (I'm assuming this) by making scene references to the the earlier movies. 

ParaNorman

Ratings: 7.1/10
Film Class: B
Genre: Animated Comedy

A young boy able to see the supernatural is outcast and misunderstood by those around him, including his family. Entrusted with a new duty to save his town from a centuries-old curse, he must overcome odds and situations that put his life in danger, risking it all to save the townspeople who never appreciated him... 

An interesting take on the supernatural, animation style, and I liked how they pun-ned the title. The jokes are quite fresh, but none too overwhelmingly memorable. There isn't much of a climax in this one, which makes it rather forgettable. 

ParaNorman kinda feels too kiddish for me, the witch wasn't that scary, and the zombies were just "cartoon" (daft). Other than spirits, zombies and a witch, I thought I would see other supernatural beings, but that's basically the end of the list. Even the ending wasn't impressive, leaving me pretty unsatisfied. Perhaps I would be better off betting my chips on Hotel Transylvania? Or not? (TBC)

Ted


Ratings: 7.8/10
Film Class: B+
Genre: Comedy

Ted reminded me of bad taste bears, those explicit bear figurines manufactured in UK/Europe. Brought to you by the creator of the animated sitcom Family Guy, I'm sure the type of humor you see in Family Guy is the same over here, or vice versa since I haven't caught a single episode of the sitcom. Ie. crude adult-themed humor. While I expected senseless "vulgar" humor, it proved otherwise. Ted was really a movie consisting of short snippets of in-your-face adult humor, somewhat like spongebob square pants but more explicit. And there's a nice story theme behind it - what bromance is all about.

Ted (voiced by the creator/director himself) comes to life after his owner, John Bennett (Mark Wahlberg) made a wish on Xmas day for a lifelong buddy, and had stayed as such for a long long time, until the love of John's life (Mila Kunis) comes into the picture. 

How they make Ted so life-like is remarkable, and Mark Wahlberg's consistently monotonal conversations with Ted fit just right... adding cold sarcasm to the convincing script between a grown-up kid and his talking teddy bear. There were several laugh out loud moments, and sitting through a stand-up comedy, it doesn't give you time to think about what you just laughed... it just moved on to the next pump line, and the next, and the next. In a way, that also made the scene progressions less smooth (cut out instead of fade out shots), but that didn't bother me. 

I liked this movie, especially with the holiday season around the corner, it brought back the little magical feeling of Xmas. Why it was released in September beats me, but it sure is a feel good, light-hearted, rather touching, gonna-make-your-day kinda holiday movie for the open-minded family.