Friday, January 22, 2010

Law Abiding Citizen

Rating: 8.2/10
Genre: Thriller
Overall value for money and time: 8.3/10

Judging from the movie poster, I'm not sure why this movie came out so late in Singapore but can only assume its due to censorship issues...

A father whose wife and daughter were murdered helplessly witness one of the murderers being set free due to a plea bargain. 10 years later, he's back to bring justice to those involved in the case. Afterall, he was only just a forgotten law abiding citizen who was at the mercy of the justice system.

This movie opens your eyes to the darker side of our justice system, and evokes the dilemma of morality issues. The opening sequence fires up the pace for the movie and the movie was intense throughout, leaving one in deep anticipation of what comes on next... The plot is fairly unpredictable and the direction was almost flawless. The director had a great "eye" for takes as he focuses on the "right" stuff, allowing us to "zoom" in on the emotions of the both leads, Gerard Butler and Jamie Foxx. However, the ending disappointed me as it steers itself away from the ingenuity of the entire movie, though it did still pack a semi-punch.

*spoilers ahead*. The movie was a little biased towards showing the ugly side of those serving on the justice system, might be an objective point of view, but probably a little too exaggerated. After watching this movie, oen will be disappointed with the system and might even form a cult under Gerard Butler's character, Clyde Shelton. This movie allowed us to sympathetize with the disappointed Shelton and gives us a rather twisted perspective that what he's doing is only right...

Still, one cannot blame Shelton for doing so.... If it did happen to me, if my wife and child were taken away from me, and if I had the wits to take down the system, I might even do the same. This movie proves that one cannot weigh and judge justice by rationalism alone. It's a grey area between what is right and what is wrong.

The confrontations between both protagonists were comparable to the one of American Gangster; Gerard Butler was to Denzel Washington, as Jamie Foxx was to Russell Crowe. The entire movie allowed us to feel for the characters while keeping the morality issues at bay. The rest of the supporting cast did a great job as well, no one too fake, or too outstanding to steal the limelight from both of them.

I have to say, I enjoyed the movie tremendously, packs good thinking and turned out better than expected. I chose watching Legion over this movie and though I regretted before the screening, I don't anymore. A movie which would appeal to movie thinkers and those who likes "heavy-hearted" movies. It's one hell of a gloomy movie but it's probably one of the best genre-related movies I've seen!!

Monday, January 18, 2010

Daybreakers

Rating: 7.7/10
Genre: Horror
Overall value for money and time: 8.0/10

I love the plot of the movie, it brings forth a new concept, a novel situation where vampires rule the world, and humans are the minority. It's a battle of replenishing and finding alternatives for the most scarce resource, human blood.

What I didn't like about the movie was the unnecessary shocks it gave throughout the movie. The plot alone was mouth gasping enough, and I thought the "bumps" of the "rollercoster ride" every now and then were a little disruptive to appreciating the story. Still, it did create some tension and would be able to veer your focus back on track should your mind wonder off during the movie.

Ethan Hawke, and most of the other cast, especially the highly refreshing new face of the female lead, did a commendable job on delivering a convincing performance. Was a good casting call on the director's part as all the cast were able to fully bring out the essence of their characters. I shan't spoil the ending for you, all I can say is that though the ending scene ended quite abruptly, it did end with more than just a sizzle! Great story development, great concept, great ending to top the plot and a great cast. Bad bats though... 4Gs and a B. Majority wins, so buckle up for a terror ride into the world of the vampires!!

Bangkok Dangerous

Rating: 7.5/10
Genre: Action
Overall value for money and time: 7.5/10

As a rule of thumb, any movie with Nicholas Cage in it will never fall under "total flop", and this movie once again backs this up. A hitman is on his last assigment in Bangkok where he breaks his own rules and soon questions the meaning of his very existence.

I'm disappointed with the low ratings this movie received, though I can understand where it's coming from. This movie didn't appeal that much to me at first, one of the only reasons it called out for me to give it a try was because Nicholas Cage was starring in it. First off, the poster... it feels gloomy and cheap production-like. Secondly, the title itself.. "Bangkok Dangerous" adds salt to the wounds... feels like an even cheaper production. Whenever you put a Hollywood star into a setting like Bangkok, it is almost doomed for failure (bad experience I got from the movie Push). But the director did pull it off, and it ironically enhanced the movie...

The technical difficulties, the rawness of the film, the narration of the hitman throughout the movie as if you were living his life, the action sequences, and most importantly the ending, were all plus points for this movie. I especially liked the ending, one of the coolest I've experienced for a while. I'm not sure if it's dejavu, but the ending felt somewhat familiar to me, either way, I still loved it.

The minus points for this movie would probably be those I've already mentioned, that it creates a bad first impression for most movie-goers, but I'm sure after giving this movie a try, you won't regret it. One of the coolest and rawest hitman movies I've seen so far...

Handsome Suit

Rating: 7.4/10
Genre: Comedy
Overall value for money and time: 7.6/10

A kind-hearted, yet ugly young chef cum stall owner has never been in a relationship due to his physical looks. Having been rejected since young, his lucky break came one day when a young and pretty lady entered his food stall seeking for a job. However, he was rejected once more when he expressed his feelings towards her. Dejected, a company headhunted him and gave him the opportunity to try out their newest product, "Handsome Suit", which is... self explanatory.

Initially, I thought Handsome Suit was from the same producers of 200 pounds beauty. But realised the former is Japanese and the latter, a korean film. Having watched both, I thought Handsome Suit was way better. This movie gave me a feel-good feeling because of the way it was filmed, felt like some manga-turned real-life movie with a good amount of humour in it. Apart from leaving me laughing uncontrollably at times, it had me falling prey to the very issue it wanted to address, biasness.

I thought I had it all figured out mid-way through the movie only to realise that I was a victim of my own biasness. True, this movie is obviously about inner beauty, but there's a twist in it which is surprisingly mind-opening. And because of that, this movie differentiates itself from other senseless comedies.

*Spoilers ahead* I didn't like the pre-ending scene where he stood on stage and expressed his true feelings... because it felt like it was plagiaristic of 200 pounds beauty. But because of everything else, it felt forgivable. Thus, for anyone who wants to catch a cheery feel-good movie, this will surely brighten up your day!!

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Youth Without Youth

Rating: 7.7/10
Genre: Drama
Overall value for money and time: 7.0/10

Bought the dvd off a nearby movie rental outlet and there were two main reasons why I didn't hesitate to buy this "who knows how many handed movie" even though it was 1.unheard of and 2. pretty expensive considering it's a 2007 production. The reasons were that it's from the acclaimed director of The Godfather Trilogy and that there's Tim Roth, the lead of the popular US series Lie to Me acting in it.

A 70+ year old linguistics professor who was about to commit suicide was struck by lighting while crossing the street. He awoke to find himself growing younger and gaining intellect and powers beyond the explanations of science. He soon becomes the target of the Nazis who want to capture him to study his powers and thus, leads a life of a "fugitive".

Later in his life he met a lady who looks like his deceased wife and a love story develops soon after. With the aid of his new found love, he inches slowly towards fulfilling and accomplishing his supposed life work of the origins of the human language. However, his new life was more complicated that he had imagined and before long finds himself circling back to where he started.

The fairly elaborate sypnosis is necessary for me to account for my personally ratings as there were lots of mixed reviews online... Majority didn't like the movie for being too "philosophical" and "messy". Others loved it for the supposed "deeper" meanings and renditions of time, reincarnation and spirituality. After viewing the movie, I didn't quite understand it, therefore I turned to the net for answers but to my dismay, there wasn't a complete explanation of it - not even a half complete one.

Even those who enjoyed it merely brought up terms but didn't provide reasons they loved it, probably because this movie is way too ambiguous in its original form. Therefore, after much thought into it, I have decided to pin down my own interpretation of the movie and hope that with this review, I will shed insight into the movie and hopefully spark anyone's interest in viewing it.

*Major spoilers ahead*. First off, the most obvious and apparent sypnosis of the movie is probably the key to understanding this film. Let's very quickly jump to the end of the movie. The critical point is where he re-aged and re-entered his supposed life, after which he walked out of his favourite hangout bar where he met his old time friends, vomitted blood and collapsed at the base of a long stairway. He was found dead the very next day.

That was the scene which created the "question marks" in everyone's minds, "So, was what he experienced throughout the movie real? Or was it just a figment of his imagination?" My entire interpretation is based on the assumption of the latter, that everything we experienced in the movie didn't actually happen.

Possibly, all that happened when he was lying at the base of the stairway about to take his final breath, when he had flashbacks into his past fused the imagination of another alternative life. The stairway could represent the beginning of the end. Let us return to the start of the movie. Basically, the main point was that he was on the brink of despair due to the meaningless life he was living, unrecognised for his work, lost his loved one years back and was on the verge of suicide.

Imagine an old man like him, what would be his "fantasies" of a better life? Well, everything that happened throughout the movie was what he had hoped for for a better life. Meaning - He was struck by lighting, gained profound knowledge and was hunted down by the Nazis. Who wouldn't ask for something like that? To be noticed, to be highly intellectual and to avoid falling into the hands of evil with his new found power. The idea of being different, unique and special was potrayed in that scene.

Throughout the movie, one might be puzzled that there seems to be a discontinuation of the plot, as if it didn't flow well... I think that was intentional, to represent the different aspects of what was missing in the professor's life that he needed to fill - the different episodes in his new life.

There were 3 main characters in his "new life" - a doctor who was helping him right from the start but later died in a plane crash (possibly caused by the Nazis); his alter ego who has been speaking to him in mirrors and explaining to him about the situations as he progressed along his life; and his new found love who underwent a similar accident of being struck by lightning and surviving, who was also "possessed" by Rupini (one of the first disciples of Buddha).

The doctor represented his helplessness in life, where there was no one he could longer trust (mentioned in the scene where Matt Damon cameoed) ever since his doctor was killed in the plane accident. His alter ego was his direction in life, basically himself telling him what to do and explaining his current situations to him as if he was merely a character living in his alter ego's world. As for his new found love, though it wasn't mentioned how his past love died, it was hinted when he had to stay away from her to keep her young even though being close to her allowed him to finish his life's work about the origins of the human language.

His past wife probably died because he was too focused on his work and neglected her, and didn't want to commit the same mistake again - basically the "part of the movie" with his new found love was his way of self-redemption. She was supposedly able to go back in time each night when she slept during which each trance allowed the professor to be further exposed to the early forms of language. Possibly the lighting strike was to create a common feature between both of them so that he could relate to her and the trance which she experienced probably meant she was reincarnated and not possessed, since that was a convenient explanation (in his mind) to link between his life's work and the love of his life which he lost...

At the start, he mentioned about losing an envelope which contained poison to kill himself after he woke up burnt from the lightning strike. At the end of the movie, he took out something which looked like the envelope he was holding on to at the start of the movie and it wasn't poison, instead it was his past love carrying a child. This could also mean that his past love didn't die but was merely living apart from him as he left them for his life's work and was grievened when he saw his child and ex-wife (I'm assuming they were husband and wife).

When he smashed the mirror killing his alter ego, it was the point in his "dream" that he finally wanted to wake up because the 3 major aspects of his life has already been "solved". That wasn't long before he returned to his favourite bar, before that being greeted by the counter girl saying "Welcome back", where he met his old time friends and he started to age back to his original age. That was when he told his pals that he will tell them when he has solved the problem "which everyone has". This was also a part which confused me but I think the problem he was referring to is the meaning in life. He tried to understand it, "by creating a new life, going back to it and reliving it", only to find more questions than answers...

Another major puzzling line was when he kept muttering to himself, "Where do I want the last rose?" Two roses supposedly appeared in his hand and knee respectively as if by magic in the midst of the movie and he was disrupted before the third rose appeared. He mentioned it again at the end of the movie which was extremely puzzling. I believe the 3 stalks of roses represented the 3 missing aspects of his life; wisdom, acknowledgement and love. The first two probably represented wisdom and acknowledgement, which he did manage to "solve" or receive throughout his "new" life. However, the last aspect, love, was still incomplete and left him wondering where it went, or where it should have gone.

Initially, I thought the very reason why roses were used was redundant. I soon realised that it might hold more meaning than what it appears to seem. This realisation was sparked when I noticed even the poster was all filled with roses. Why not beans? Why not wands? Why not water bottles? Roses are often associated with love, passion. Therefore, his passion for wisdom, acknowledgement and love were the 3 main missing aspects of his current life. Ultimately, all 3 led to finding the true meaning in his life, the problem he was trying to solve. However, it seemed that the most vital aspect was the last, which was love itself. It's incompletion took away all meaning in his life, which left him back to square one at the end of the movie.

The 3 missing aspects of his life were gained "magically", as suggested in the movie. This could also represent the "magical" enlightenment of how one achieves wisdom, acknowledgement and most important love. Love in itself.... is magically...

Another interesting part of the movie to recall is that his alter ego said something like, "Guess I won't be needed for a time." After which he faded away and didn't appear for a while in the movie. All these happened when his new love found the cave which Rupini supposedly died in it and returned to her normal self. This further enforced my interpretation of how his alter ego was the direction in his life and his new love created a new "direction" in his life.

These are most of the vivid parts which I remember of the film and though it might sound overthought, I believe that my interpretation holds some truth of the matter. Still, it's all up to individual's interpretations which makes these kind of movies so interesting in its own right. It reminds me of another classic movie, Mulholland Drive. and I think this movie is apt only for those who loves thought provoking movies. If you're not one like that, missing this film wouldn't be a great deal to you.

In essence, this movie is just a highly abstract love story, with it's other elements such as space time continuum, reincarnation, bypassing human abilities etc. simply as "byproducts" which helps to enhance the storyline (my perception of the movie is different in this sense as most believes the gist of the movie are the elements). This movie is possibly trying to bring across to the audience that "Love creates the real meaning in life". No one can stand loneliness, humans are in nature social beings, not solitary ones...

Frankly, I didn't like Tim Roth's acting in this film, mediocre not fantastic, but everyone else did a great job, especially the female lead. Youth without Youth, as the movie title suggests, being young again when you're not actually young. The inversion of the text could probably mean an inverted perception of what youth is really all about (further enhanced by inverted takes throughout the movie). Youth without Youth is not your average cup of tea, highly subjective movie which either confuses you whole, or opens your mind to another world of film making.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Bottom 10 Movies of 2009

I guess no list is complete without the bottom runners... so here's the top 5 (or 6) stay-away movies of 2009 (was difficult to squeeze out 10) ...

1. The Treasure Hunter - Total flop, in the family tree of worse movies ever made
2. Crank: High Voltage - Utterly nauseating and senseless
3. Push - Extremely disappointing, feels like a cheap production
4. Blood: The Last Vampire - Forced dialogue, forced acting
5. Bride Wars / I Love You, Man - Worst chick flick/man flick made

Rumoured flops: Bruno, The Storm Riders 2, The Twilight Saga: New Moon (didn't catch them myself as my friends warned me to stay away from them)